Blender manufacturer sued after claim blenders caused injuries

Scott Blumenshine

Get a Free Case Evaluation

Complete the form for a 

free case review

testimonials

M, Bentley

Thank you for taking my case and being so kind and considerate and never forgetting to update me on where we were in the process. Thank you Scott and Catalina and anyone else that worked on my case.

Natalie A. 

I was in an accident and hired this law firm to represent me, I was very satisfied with the outcome. If I have more legal needs in the future I will give them a call.

Related Content

May 16, 2024

Brain Injury and PTSD

May 15, 2024

Introduction to Jet Bridge Accidents

Our Office

traffic Chicago

177 N. Jefferson St., Suite 203

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 766-1000

Download Free e-Book - Uninsured, Hit and Run and Underinsured Motorist

Am I Covered ebook

Many users of a high-speed blender called the NutriBullet received something unexpected when using the blender - serious injuries. Sheryl Utal said she used her NutriBullet daily for years to make smoothies – until one morning, she received second-degree burns from a Nutribullet exploding. "It just came flying out all over me, all over the kitchen, the ceilings, the walls," Utal said. The burns left her arms “on fire.” So far, 22 people have filed personal injury lawsuits seeking damages for their injuries from the manufacturer of the blender.

The legal allegations are that a manufacturing defect of the blender causes pressure to build up inside the blender as the canister spins. Heat and pressure are created which can cause the canister to blow up. When it does, users can be injured.

Consumers Injured by Faulty Blenders

Consumers injured by the blender have suffered second-degree burns on their arms and chests. One victim says her face was badly burned. Others suffered severe cuts from the blades when the explosion happened just as they were reaching for the canister.

One explosion left a man with a severely damaged eyeball in addition to severe facial burns. When the blender exploded, warm, sticky “goo” flew into one eye, and he required months of treatment.

Another man said he had used the same device for more than 20 years when, one morning, when he went to grab the blender after it had been running only for about 20 seconds, it exploded, and his hand went right into the blades. He explains that “the two blades chopped into my pal. It hit a branch of my ulnar nerve.” He suffered permanent nerve damage and has no feeling in one finger.

When contacted for a statement, the manufacturer, Homeland Housewares, seemed surprised that its blender was causing injuries. A spokesperson initially stated that the company would “investigate the claims thoroughly and analyze the blenders to determine exactly what happened. Whatever the circumstances surrounding these accidents, we wish prompt and complete recoveries to those involved.”

Product Liability: A Manufacturing Defect

Three types of product defects may give rise to legal action:

  1. A design defect
  2. A manufacturing defect
  3. A marketing defect

A design defect requires expert testimony of how the product was designed in a way that made the device unreasonably dangerous. A marketing defect is where the manufacturer or distributor fails to provide proper warnings about the use and safety of the product.

In the NutriBlender case, a manufacturing defect is defined as “a defect in a product that was not intended.” This kind of defect occurs when a product departs from its intended design and is more dangerous than consumers expect the product to be. It is essentially a mistake in the manufacturing of the device.

One example of a manufacturing defect is a chair that collapses when someone sits on it. It was designed to be stable, but in manufacturing, one leg was incorrectly bolted onto the seat, causing it to collapse when used as designed. Another example is if an item leaves the factory without all of its intended parts. Even though the defect was unintended, the manufacturer is still liable for harm caused by its defective product.

Who is Responsible?

Plaintiffs do not need to prove the manufacturer was negligent. They only must prove the product had a defect and that defect caused the injury. It may sound simple, but manufacturers usually respond defensively and aggressively by saying the product did not have a manufacturing defect. Indeed, manufacturers and their insurance companies and lawyers typically blame the injured person, alleging the person must have been injured while improperly using the product.

Manufacturer Blames Consumers

This is precisely the approach being used by NutriBlender. Although it initially claimed it would “thoroughly investigate” and hoped those injured would have a prompt recovery, it did not take the company very long to turn around and blame the users for their injuries.

The company stated that users should have no problems with the devices if they used them “in accordance with the directions provided in the instruction manual, which is nine pages long.” Attorneys for victims note that the NutriBlender did not always come with the nine-page instruction manual, and none of the victims had any warnings that the device might overheat and blow up.

Contact a Product Liability Attorney

If you were burned or cut when a device, whether the NutriBlender or a similar product, one of our product liability attorneys at the Blumenshine Law Group can help. Call or text us at (312)766-1000 or email [email protected] for a free consultation.

Free Case Consultation

Please provide your information to questions in the form or call

(312)766-1000

(24/7)

Se habla español


By submitting form you agree to receive email, SMS and phone communication from Blumenshine Law Group. The information contained in the website should not be considered legal advice. The best guidance for your specific legal issue is to contact one of our lawyers.